Smith v. Super. Ct. CA4/2

Filed 7/18/13 Smith v. Super. Ct. CA4/2

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

ARTHUR D. SMITH,

Petitioner, E058810

v. (Super.Ct.No. RIF130256)

THE SUPERIOR COURT OF OPINION RIVERSIDE COUNTY,

Respondent;

THE PEOPLE,

Real Party in Interest.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDINGS; petition for writ of mandate. Edward D. Webster,

Judge. (Retired judge of the Riverside Super. Ct. assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant

to art. VI, § 6 of the Cal. Const.) Petition granted.

Arthur D. Smith, in. pro. per., for Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.

1

Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General, and Holly D. Wilkens, Deputy Attorney

General, for Real Party in Interest.

The court has read and considered the petition for writ of mandate and the

informal response filed by the Attorney General. The Attorney General concedes that

petitioner is entitled to the appointment of an attorney. Given this concession, this court