P. v. Wilcoxson CA1/1
Filed 7/9/13 P. v. Wilcoxson CA1/1 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION ONE
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, A134801
v. (Lake County SAHRA ARLINE WILCOXSON, Super. Ct. Nos. CR921179, CR923713, CR926806, CR928053) Defendant and Appellant.
Defendant Sahra Arline Wilcoxson contends the sentencing court failed to state valid statutory bases for all fines and penalty assessments imposed in connection with her guilty and no-contest pleas in four cases. She seeks remand for the court to specify the statutory bases for the fines and penalties imposed, and enter a final minute order reflecting its oral judgment. We correct the sentencing minute order in two respects, but find no basis to remand the case for further sentencing proceedings. I. BACKGROUND Defendant pleaded guilty or no contest in the four cases summarized below. The underlying facts are drawn from the probation officer‟s reports. A. Case No. CR921179 On January 5, 2010, a sheriff‟s deputy, who recognized defendant, stopped her for driving on a suspended California driver‟s license. The deputy found methamphetamine in defendant‟s possession during a search of her vehicle. She was arrested for driving under the influence.
On February 5, 2010, defendant pleaded guilty to possession of methamphetamine while on bail (Health & Saf. Code, § 11377, subd. (a)), driving while under the influence (Veh. Code, § 23152, subd. (a)), and driving on a suspended license with prior convictions (Veh. Code, § 14601.1). On March 12, 2010, the trial court granted defendant probation. B. Case No. CR923713 On October 29, 2010, during a search following a vehicle stop, police found three plastic bags containing methamphetamine in defendant‟s possession. On November 8, 2011, defendant pleaded no contest to possession of methamphetamine. (Health & Saf. Code, § 11377, subd. (a).) C. Case No. CR926806 On June 7, 2011, while on searchable probation, defendant was found in possession of a plastic bag of methamphetamine and a glass smoking pipe. On November 8, 2011, defendant pleaded no contest to an additional count of possession of methamphetamine. (Health & Saf. Code, § 11377, subd. (a).) D. Case No. CR928053 On October 21, 2011, defendant was arrested and taken to the county jail. When warned that it was a felony to bring any controlled substances into the jail, defendant stated that she did not have any illegal items on her person. During a search at the jail, 3.5 grams of methamphetamine were found in defendant‟s underwear. This offense was committed while defendant was on bail in three other cases. On November 8, 2011, defendant pleaded guilty to bringing a controlled substance and paraphernalia into a place where prisoners or inmates are located (Pen. Code, § 4573) and admitted one on-bail enhancement allegation (Pen. Code, § 12022.1). The guilty plea also constituted an admission to violation of probation in case No. CR921179. E. Sentencing On December 20, 2011, the trial court sentenced defendant in each of the above cases to a total combined term of eight years. This was agreed to be an eight-year split
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)