People v. Mauricio CA2/8
Filed 2/5/25 P. v. Mauricio CA2/8 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION EIGHT
THE PEOPLE, B340420
Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. TA088962) v.
MICHAEL ANGELO MAURICIO,
Defendant and Appellant.
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles, Teresa P. Magno, Judge. Reversed. Bess Stiffelman, under appointment by the Court of Appeal for Defendant and Appellant. Rob Bonta, Attorney General, Lance E. Winters, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Susan Sullivan Pithey, Assistant Attorney General, Noah P. Hill and Thomas C. Hsieh, Deputy Attorneys General for Plaintiff and Respondent. _______________________
In 2010, a jury convicted appellant Michael Mauricio of three counts of first degree murder with special circumstance, gang, and firearm discharge findings. The trial court sentenced Mauricio to three consecutive terms of life without the possibility of parole (LWOP) plus three terms of 25 years to life for the firearm findings. In 2015, Mauricio was resentenced to a total state prison term of 150 years to life. Mauricio was a minor when he committed the offenses of conviction. On June 29, 2023, Mauricio filed a petition for recall and resentencing pursuant to Penal Code1 section 1170, subdivision (d)(1)(A). He contended that because he had been resentenced as a minor to the functional equivalent of a life sentence without the possibility of parole, he was entitled to recall and resentencing. The trial court appointed counsel to represent Mauricio, conducted a hearing on August 9, 2024, and denied the petition. It found Mauricio was ineligible for relief because he was not currently sentenced to LWOP. This appeal followed.2 DISCUSSION Section 1170, subdivision (d)(1)(A), enacted in 2012, and renumbered in 2021, permits a defendant serving an LWOP sentence to file a petition seeking recall and resentencing if the defendant was under the age of 18 at the time of the commission of the offense, has served at least 15 years before petitioning for
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)