People v. Limon CA2/8
Filed 1/30/25 P. v. Limon CA2/8 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION EIGHT
THE PEOPLE, B328655
Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. KA094106) v.
GLORIA FELIZ MARIE LIMON et al.,
Defendants and Appellants.
APPEAL from orders of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Deborah S. Brazil, Judge. Affirmed with directions. Tanya Dellaca, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant Gloria Feliz Marie Limon. Carlo Andreani, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant Crystal Marlene Mejia. Rob Bonta, Attorney General, Lance E. Winters, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Susan Sullivan Pithey, Assistant Attorney General, Idan Ivri and Roberta L. Davis, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent. **********
Defendants and appellants Gloria Feliz Marie Limon and Crystal Marlene Mejia appeal from the orders denying, at the prima facie stage, their respective petitions for resentencing pursuant to Penal Code section 1172.6 (former § 1170.95). We affirm. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL SUMMARY In 2012, defendants Limon and Mejia, along with three other codefendants, were found guilty by jury of numerous felonies arising from a coordinated attack on a female victim in April 2011. Limon and Mejia were each found guilty of conspiracy to commit murder and robbery (Pen. Code, § 182, subd. (a); count 1), first degree robbery (Pen. Code, § 211; count 3), unlawful driving or taking of a vehicle (Veh. Code, § 10851, subd. (a); count 4), and kidnapping to commit robbery (Pen. Code, § 209, subd. (b)(1); count 5). (People v. Mejia (Mar. 16, 2015, B243500) [nonpub. opn.].) As to counts 1, 3 and 5, Limon and Mejia were each found to have used a deadly weapon and inflicted great bodily injury in the commission of the offenses. (Ibid.) Limon and Mejia were acquitted of attempted murder (count 2). (Ibid.) As relevant to this appeal, the court sentenced Limon on count 1 (conspiracy to commit murder), to 25 years to life (Pen. Code, § 182), plus three years for the great bodily injury enhancement (§ 12022.7, subd. (a)), and one year for the personal use enhancement (§ 12022, subd. (b)(1)). Also as to count 1, the court imposed and stayed an upper term of six years for conspiracy to commit robbery. The court imposed sentences on the other counts but it is unnecessary to recite the terms of those sentences here. The court awarded Limon 552 days of custody credits. (People v. Mejia, supra, B243500.) As relevant here, Mejia admitted a prior strike, and the court sentenced her as a second-strike offender. As to count 1 (conspiracy
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)