People v. Bridges CA2/8
Filed 1/22/25 P. v. Bridges CA2/8 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION EIGHT
THE PEOPLE, B337637
Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BA234845) v.
MARK DESHAWN BRIDGES,
Defendant and Appellant.
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, David Herriford, Judge. Affirmed. John F. Schuck, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent. _______________________
Pursuant to People v. Delgadillo (2022) 14 Cal.5th 216 (Delgadillo), we review an order denying Mark Bridges’s petition for resentencing brought under Penal Code1 section 1172.6. We affirm the trial court. BACKGROUND On May 9, 2003, a jury found Bridges guilty of one count of first degree murder and one count of attempted murder. The jury also found true enhancements for personal use and discharge of a firearm as to both offenses. The trial court sentenced Bridges to life plus 75 years-to-life in state prison. On June 28, 2022, Bridges filed a petition for resentencing pursuant to former section 1170.95 (now § 1172.6). The trial court appointed counsel for Bridges and, on March 7, 2023, found that a prima facie showing for resentencing had been made. The trial court issued an order to show cause and set the matter for an evidentiary hearing pursuant to section 1172.6, subdivision (d). At the hearing on April 16, 2024, the trial court reviewed the trial testimony and denied the petition, finding that the People had proven beyond a reasonable doubt that Bridges was the actual shooter. This appeal followed. We appointed counsel for Bridges on appeal. On December 9, 2024, counsel filed a no-issue brief pursuant to People v. Delgadillo. Counsel also stated he advised Bridges he could file his own supplemental brief within 30 days. Counsel sent Bridges transcripts of the record on appeal as well as a copy of the brief.
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)