In re Parsa B. CA4/1
Filed 12/5/24 In re Parsa B. CA4/1 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION ONE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In re PARSA B., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. D083870 THE PEOPLE,
Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. J242147) v.
PARSA B.,
Defendant and Appellant.
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Robert J. Trentacosta, Judge. Affirmed. Marta I. Stanton, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent. This appeal arises from a Welfare and Institutions Code section 602 juvenile delinquency proceeding. The minor, Parsa B., appeals from an order of the juvenile court after a review hearing in which the court declined his request to reduce the baseline term of his commitment by 6 months, and instead reduced it by 35 days. Parsa’s appointed counsel has filed a brief
under the procedures set forth in People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441– 443 (Wende) and Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738, 744 (Anders). Parsa was afforded the opportunity to file a supplemental brief but has not done so in the time allotted. Having independently reviewed the entire record in accordance with Wende and Anders and having found no reasonably arguable issues for reversal on appeal, we affirm. STATEMENT OF THE CASE AND FACTS On May 30, 2019, Parsa admitted to one count of assault with a deadly
weapon under Penal Code1 section 245, subdivision (a)(1). The charge stemmed from an incident in which Parsa threw a skateboard at another minor, striking him in the lower back. The juvenile court adjudged Parsa a ward of the court, placed him at home with his parents, and ordered probation with a number of restrictions. On September 3, 2019, Parsa admitted to several violations of his probation, including failing to participate in a psychological evaluation or substance abuse counseling, testing positive for alcohol, and violating curfew. On September 17, 2019, the juvenile court ordered Parsa committed to Urban Camp for a period not to exceed 85 days. On January 10, 2020, Parsa admitted to one count of petty theft in violation of section 484. The People alleged that Parsa stole two bottles of alcohol from a convenience store. On January 27, 2020, the juvenile court placed Parsa under the supervision of a probation officer, with a GPS tracker. The court also ordered but stayed a commitment to Urban Camp for a period not to exceed 130 days. In a trailing matter, on February 7, 2020, Parsa admitted to probation violations of testing positive for controlled substances
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)