In re R.A. CA3

Filed 11/21/24 In re R.A. CA3 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Sacramento) ----

In re R.A., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court C100870 Law.

THE PEOPLE, (Super. Ct. No. JV141773)

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

R.A.,

Defendant and Appellant.

Appointed counsel for minor R.A. asked this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal, pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436. Finding no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to R.A., we will affirm the judgment.

1

BACKGROUND A. Initial Petitions In April 2022, the People filed a five-count petition alleging, for reasons not relevant to our disposition, that the minor came within the jurisdiction of the juvenile court pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 602.1 Minor was detained and found ineligible for deferred entry of judgment under section 790. On May 12, 2022, minor was released home on electronic monitoring. Minor’s detention was downgraded to home supervision on August 2, 2022. Minor subsequently denied the allegations in the petition. On October 7, 2022, the People filed a single-count petition alleging minor came within the jurisdiction of the juvenile court pursuant to section 602. Minor was detained and found ineligible for deferred entry of judgment. Minor denied the People’s allegations; minor remained in custody in “[j]uvenile [h]all.” On October 24, 2022, the People filed an eight-count petition alleging minor came within the jurisdiction of the juvenile court pursuant to section 602. Custody of minor was continued, he was detained, and on October 25, 2022, he denied the People’s allegations. Again, the juvenile court found minor was not eligible for deferred entry of judgment. In November 2022, the People filed a two-count petition alleging minor came within the jurisdiction of the juvenile court pursuant to section 602. Minor was detained and found ineligible for deferred entry of judgment; he denied the allegations. On December 22, 2022, the People filed a single-count petition alleging minor came within the jurisdiction of the juvenile court pursuant to section 602. Minor was detained and found ineligible for deferred entry of judgment; he denied the allegations.