People v. Perez CA2/5
Filed 10/7/24 P. v. Perez CA2/5 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION FIVE
THE PEOPLE, B333789
Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. v. VA155232)
MARIAH PEREZ,
Defendant and Appellant.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Maria Davalos, Judge. Affirmed. Miriam K. Billington, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance by Plaintiff and Respondent.
On August 4, 2020, Valerie P. (Valerie) said hello to Jessie Cortes (Cortes), a male acquaintance who walked past her with a bicycle. A few seconds later, Valerie heard a woman say, “Don’t say hi to my man.” Valerie turned around, and defendant and appellant Mariah Perez (defendant) stabbed her in the arm with a knife. A passerby who witnessed the stabbing provided aid to Valerie and called 911. Valerie’s injury required surgery, and she was still suffering from the effects of the injury at the time of trial, more than two years later. Defendant was tried on a charge of assault with a deadly weapon for stabbing Valerie. The jury convicted her and found true several sentencing allegations: that defendant inflicted great bodily injury, that the crime involved great violence and great bodily harm, and that defendant was armed with and used a weapon at the time of the commission of the offense. The trial court sentenced defendant to the mid-term of three years in state prison for the assault conviction and three more years in prison for the great bodily injury enhancement allegation. The court awarded defendant 428 days of actual custody credit and 64 days of conduct credit, for a total of 492 days of credit. Defendant appealed from the judgment of conviction and this court appointed counsel to represent her. After examining the record, counsel filed an opening brief raising no issues. On May 13, 2024, this court advised defendant she had 30 days to personally submit any contentions or issues she wanted us to consider. We received no response. We have examined the appellate record, and we are satisfied defendant’s attorney on appeal has complied with the
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)