In re A.A. CA3
Filed 8/22/24 In re A.A. CA3 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Yolo) ----
In re A.A., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court C099777 Law.
THE PEOPLE, (Super. Ct. Nos. JD2021-0169, JD2022-0075, JD2022-0202, Plaintiff and Respondent, JD2023-0091)
v.
A.A.,
Defendant and Appellant.
This appeal involving minor A.A. (the minor) comes to us pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende) and In re Kevin S. (2003) 113 Cal.App.4th 97. Our review of the record indicates that although the juvenile court orally determined the minor’s maximum term of confinement, the applicable minute orders do not mention it. We will affirm the judgment and direct the juvenile court to correct the relevant minute orders to set forth the minor’s maximum term of confinement.
1
BACKGROUND The People initiated wardship proceedings in October 2021, alleging that the minor (who was 14 years old at the time) committed second degree burglary (Pen. Code, § 459 -- count 1),1 felony vandalism (§ 594, subd. (a) -- counts 2-3), resisting a police officer (§ 148, subd. (a)(1) -- count 4), misdemeanor battery (§ 242 -- count 5), and evading a police officer by motor vehicle (Veh. Code, § 2800.1 subd. (a) -- count 6). The minor admitted the count 2 charge of felony vandalism and the count 5 charge of misdemeanor battery, and the remaining counts were dismissed on the People’s motion. The juvenile court placed the minor on six months informal probation. In April 2022, probation filed a petition for violation of probation. The next month, the People filed a new wardship petition alleging the minor had committed battery with serious bodily injury (§ 243, subd. (d) -- count 1) and assault by means of force likely to cause great bodily injury (§ 245, subd. (a)(4) -- count 2). The minor admitted the count 2 charge of assault and he also admitted the probation violation allegations. The remaining count was dismissed. The juvenile court determined that the minor was a ward of the court and continued his probation with additional conditions, including general gang conditions. In December 2022, the People filed another wardship petition alleging the minor had evaded a police officer by motor vehicle (Veh. Code, § 2800.1, subd. (a) -- count 1) and drove without a license (Veh. Code, § 12500, subd. (a) -- count 2). The People also filed a notice alleging the minor violated probation. The minor admitted the count one charge of evading and the related probation violation. The remaining count was dismissed. At a disposition hearing in March 2023, the juvenile court ordered the minor
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)