People v. Mauricio CA4/1

Filed 7/24/24 P. v. Mauricio CA4/1 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE PEOPLE, D082816

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v. (Super. Ct. No. SCD287305)

OSWALDO RUIZ MAURICIO,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, David M. Gill, Judge. Affirmed. Oswaldo Ruiz Mauricio, in pro. per.; and Sheila O’Connor, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.

A jury convicted Oswaldo Ruiz Mauricio of two counts of oral copulation/sexual penetration of a child younger than 10 years old (Pen.

Code,1 § 288.7, subd. (b); counts 1 and 2); six counts of committing a lewd act

1 Statutory references are to the Penal Code unless otherwise specified.

upon a child (§ 288, subd. (a); counts 3 through 8); and one count of sending harmful material with the intent to seduce a minor (§ 288.2, subd. (a); count 9). The court sentenced Mauricio to prison for 30 years to life plus 12 years eight months. Mauricio timely filed a notice of appeal. Appellate counsel has filed a brief pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende) indicating counsel has not been able to identify any arguable issues for reversal on appeal. Counsel asks the court to independently review the record for error as mandated by Wende. We advised Mauricio he could file is own brief on appeal. He has responded with a supplemental brief. Mauricio’s submission does not raise any potentially meritorious issues for reversal of the appeal.