DecisionDepot
California legal research
All judges

Thomas D. Long

LA · 14 rulings ingested

Ruling distribution
14
rulings
Granted43%
Denied29%
Continued7%
Other21%
Prevailing party
12
determined
Plaintiff25%
Defendant50%
Mixed25%
At a glance
Grant rate43%
Denial rate29%
Continuance rate7%
First seenJul 16, 2026
Most recentSep 1, 2026

Motion type breakdown

Other
5
Demurrer
4
Motion to Compel Discovery
4
Motion to Compel Further Responses
2
Motion to Strike
2
Ex Parte Application
1
Granted
Denied
Continued
Other

Recent rulings

CaseCountyMotionRulingIndexedHearing
24STCV26784
Vivian Sultan v. Southern California Edison Company, et al.
la
Civil
Motion to compel Plaintiff to respond to questionsDENIEDAug 27, 2026Sep 1, 2026
24STCV21989
Jose Armenta v. Sonic Industries, Inc., et al.
la
Civil
Motion to Compel DepositionDENIEDAug 20, 2026Aug 27, 2026
24STCV28296
William Leo Jackson v. Los Angeles County Sheriffs Men Central Jail, et al.
la
Civil
Motion for Leave to Amend; Motion for AccessDENIEDAug 24, 2026Aug 25, 2026
25STCV18248
Ricardo Quezada v. General Motors, LLC
la
Civil
Motion to Compel DepositionGRANTEDAug 24, 2026Aug 25, 2026
25STCV06875
Unknown
la
Civil
Ex parte application; DemurrerGRANTED; SUSTAINEDAug 24, 2026Aug 25, 2026
25STCV07294
MARIA MARTINEZ v. AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC. ET AL.
la
Civil
Motion to Deem Requests for Admission AdmittedGRANTEDJul 21, 2026Jul 23, 2026
25STCV34213
DINA ANDKHOY v. NORDSTROM, INC., et al.
la
Civil
Motion to Compel ArbitrationGRANTEDJul 21, 2026Jul 23, 2026
25STCV09281
EVERETT MALDONADO v. BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC, ET AL.
la
Civil
Motion to Compel DepositionDENIEDJul 21, 2026Jul 23, 2026
25STCV27563
Karina Torres v. BBDI LLC dba Black Bear Diner, et al.
la
Civil
Motion to Compel Further Responses to FROG; Motion to Compel Further Responses to SROG; Motion to Compel Further Responses to RFPGRANTED in part; DENIED in partJul 16, 2026Jul 16, 2026
25STCV19753
David E. Brown and Rene S. Brown v. Ford Motor Company, et al.
la
Civil
DemurrerSUSTAINED in part and OVERRULED in partJul 16, 2026Jul 16, 2026
26STCV00484
Ronald J. Radke v. John Doe 1, et al.
la
Civil
Motion for Early DiscoveryCONTINUEDJul 16, 2026Jul 16, 2026
25STCV08680
Citizens of Humanity, LLC v. Roy Hirsch, et al.
la
Civil
Motion to compel further responses to RFP Set One; Motion to compel further responses to RFP Set TwoGRANTEDJul 16, 2026Jul 16, 2026
25STCV18918
Benjamin Gutkmecht v. FCA US, LLC, et al.
la
Civil
Demurrer; Motion to StrikeSUSTAINED; GRANTEDJul 16, 2026Jul 16, 2026
25STCV19414
Daniel Garcia Velazquez v. FCA US, LLC, et al.
la
Civil
Demurrer; Motion to StrikeSUSTAINED in part and OVERRULED in part; GRANTEDJul 16, 2026Jul 16, 2026

Frequently asked questions

What is Judge Thomas D. Long's grant rate in California Superior Court?+

Based on 14 tentative rulings indexed by DecisionDepot, Judge Thomas D. Long has a 43% grant rate (29% denial rate, 7% continued). Counties active: LA.

What kinds of motions does Judge Thomas D. Long hear most often?+

The most common motion type in Judge Thomas D. Long's indexed rulings is Other. The full motion-type breakdown appears on this page — each motion type shows grant, denial, and continuance counts so practitioners can prepare accordingly.