Key takeaways
- The United States Supreme Court denied certiorari in Game Plan, Inc. v. Uninterrupted IP, LLC.
- The denial leaves intact a December 10, 2025, decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
- The Federal Circuit previously affirmed the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board's cancellation of the trademark "I AM MORE THAN AN ATHLETE."
- Game Plan, Inc. loses its federal registration for the phrase.
The Decision
The United States Supreme Court denied certiorari in the trademark dispute between Game Plan, Inc. and Uninterrupted IP, LLC. The denial finalizes the cancellation of a federal trademark registration for the phrase "I AM MORE THAN AN ATHLETE."
By declining to hear the case, the Supreme Court leaves in place the judgment of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. On December 10, 2025, the Federal Circuit issued its decision in Game Plan, Inc. v. Uninterrupted Ip, LLC, which affirmed the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board's order to cancel the registration. Game Plan, Inc., the owner of the cancelled trademark registration, sought Supreme Court review after the appellate court ruled against it. The Supreme Court's refusal to grant the petition ends the litigation over the federal registration of the phrase.
Why It Matters
The Supreme Court's refusal to intervene signals that the justices see no compelling reason to disturb the Federal Circuit's handling of trademark cancellation appeals involving sports-related slogans. When the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board cancels a mark, the Federal Circuit applies specific standards of review to the board's factual findings and legal conclusions. The affirmance in this dispute demonstrates the high burden trademark owners face when attempting to reverse a cancellation order on appeal.
Because the Supreme Court hears very few cases each term, a denial of certiorari often indicates that the lower court applied existing law correctly or that the case lacks a split among the circuit courts requiring resolution. For the sports apparel and media industries, the finality of this cancellation means that broad, motivational phrases like "I AM MORE THAN AN ATHLETE" remain highly vulnerable to challenges from competitors. Companies often use such phrases across merchandise, broadcasting, and social media, making the boundaries of trademark protection highly contested. The resolution of this case establishes that the Federal Circuit will uphold board decisions that remove such slogans from the federal register when the legal requirements for cancellation are met.
Who Should Care
For lawyers
Intellectual property litigators and trademark prosecutors should note the Federal Circuit's deference to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. When advising clients on the registration and defense of slogan marks, attorneys must prepare for aggressive cancellation proceedings. The finality of the December 10, 2025, decision reinforces the reality that the board serves as the primary battleground for trademark validity. Overturning the board's decisions at the appellate level requires demonstrating clear legal error or a complete lack of substantial evidence, a standard that appellate courts rarely find satisfied in factual disputes over trademark usage. Practitioners must build their strongest evidentiary records before the board, rather than relying on the Federal Circuit to reweigh the evidence.
For consumers and parties
For sports brands, athletes, and marketing agencies, the cancellation of the "I AM MORE THAN AN ATHLETE" registration serves as a clear warning. Companies cannot assume that securing a trademark registration guarantees permanent exclusive rights to a phrase. Competitors can petition to cancel a mark if they believe it does not function as a trademark or if another party has prior rights. The Supreme Court's decision to stay out of the dispute means Game Plan, Inc. has exhausted its legal avenues to save this specific federal registration. Brands must continuously evaluate whether their slogans operate as true source identifiers or merely as common motivational statements that belong in the public domain.
Legal Background
The United States Patent and Trademark Office registers trademarks, but those registrations are subject to administrative review. Under federal law, a third party can file a petition with the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board to cancel an existing registration. Grounds for cancellation vary widely. A challenger might argue that the mark causes a likelihood of confusion with an earlier brand, that the phrase is merely descriptive of the goods or services, or that the phrase fails to function as a source identifier entirely.
If the board issues a cancellation order after reviewing the evidence and arguments, the trademark owner has the right to appeal. Appeals from the board typically go to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which holds exclusive jurisdiction over these specific administrative appeals. The appellate court reviews the board's legal interpretations without deference, meaning it looks at the law fresh. However, the court must accept the board's factual findings if they are supported by substantial evidence. In Game Plan Inc v. Uninterrupted Ip Llc, the dispute centered on the viability of the registration and the board's authority to order its removal from the federal register based on the evidence presented during the cancellation proceeding.
What the Court Did
The Supreme Court issued a simple order denying the petition for a writ of certiorari. The Court provided no written explanation for the denial, which aligns with its standard practice for the vast majority of petitions it receives.
The operative legal reasoning therefore remains the December 10, 2025, decision by the Federal Circuit. In that ruling, the appellate court affirmed the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board's cancellation of the "I AM MORE THAN AN ATHLETE" mark. The Federal Circuit concluded that the board properly evaluated the evidentiary record and correctly applied trademark law when it determined that Game Plan, Inc.'s registration should be cancelled. The appellate court found no reversible error in the board's procedures or its ultimate conclusion. By denying certiorari, the Supreme Court allowed this appellate judgment to stand as the final word on the matter, effectively closing the case and confirming the loss of the trademark registration for Game Plan, Inc.
How It May Be Applied
The resolution of this case provides a clear roadmap for how similar disputes will proceed in the future. Competitors in the sports and entertainment sectors will likely continue to use the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board as a primary venue for clearing marketing slogans. The board offers a specialized forum for challenging registrations without the expense of federal district court litigation.
Future trademark applicants must evaluate whether their proposed slogans are strong enough to withstand a cancellation petition. If a mark is cancelled by the board, the owner must recognize that the Federal Circuit will heavily scrutinize the appeal, and the Supreme Court is highly unlikely to grant review. Brands may need to rely on alternative legal theories, such as unfair competition or common law trademark rights, if they lose their federal registrations.
Procedural Timeline
| Tribunal | Action | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Trademark Trial and Appeal Board | Cancellation Proceeding | Ordered cancellation of the "I AM MORE THAN AN ATHLETE" registration. |
| U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit | Appellate Review | Affirmed the board's cancellation on December 10, 2025. |
| U.S. Supreme Court | Petition for Certiorari | Denied review, ending the litigation. |
A Final Word on Certiorari
A denial of certiorari is not a ruling on the merits of a case. It simply means that fewer than four justices voted to hear the appeal. However, the practical effect is absolute: the lower court's decision becomes final and binding on the parties involved. For Game Plan, Inc., the denial marks the end of its effort to restore the federal trademark registration for its athlete-focused slogan, leaving the phrase unprotected by a federal registration.
This article is general legal information and commentary about legal developments. It is not legal advice, does not address your specific situation, and is not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney. Reading this article and contacting us through this website do not create an attorney-client relationship.
Sources & authorities
Further reading
Additional perspectives (a link is not an endorsement):