| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Indexed | Hearing |
|---|
| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Indexed | Hearing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
26CV-0042 Gaea Edde Powell v. County of San Luis Obispo | slo · Civil | Petition for Writ of Mandate | Denied as to records between Clerk-Recorder’s Office and County Counsel’s Office; regarding records between Clerk-Recorder’s Office and District Attorney’s Office, more information is needed. |
| Jun 3, 2026 |
| Jun 3, 2026 |
25CV154193 RASHAD vs STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACTING BY AND THROUGH THE CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL | alameda · Civil Keith Fong | Demurrer to First and Third Causes of Action; Motion to Strike; Motion to Reclassify | Demurrer Sustained with Leave to Amend; Motion to Strike GRANTED; Motion to Reclassify GRANTED | May 27, 2026 | May 26, 2026 |
25CV154193 RASHAD vs STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACTING BY AND THROUGH THE CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL | alameda · Civil Keith Fong | Motion to Reclassify (Walker Motion) | GRANTED | May 27, 2026 | May 26, 2026 |
26CV00248 BAM PROPERTIES LLC V. CITY OF OROVILLE | butte · Civil Mosbarger | Respondent and Defendant City of Oroville’s Demurrer to First Amended Petition for Writ of Mandate and Complaint of Petitioner and Plaintiff BAM Properties LLC | SUSTAINED in part; OVERRULED in part | May 19, 2026 | May 20, 2026 |
CGC24616382 ZAHIR NASERI VS. OFFICE OF THE MAYOR | sf · Civil Joseph M. Quinn | Motion For Judgment On The Pleadings | Defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings on the operative pleading filed on 9/25/25 entitled "First Amended Complaint" is GRANTED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND as to causes of action 1-4 and 6-7. The motion is GRANTED WITH 20 DAYS LEAVE TO AMEND as to cause of action five for violation of the California Public Records Act ("CPRA"). | May 18, 2026 | Mar 20, 2026 |