Case	County / Judge	Motion	Ruling	Indexed	Hearing

Live data

19,375 rulings indexed. Last ingest about 2 hours ago.

Data refreshes about every 15 minutes during California business hours.

Explore

New case filings Monitored counties + coverage Judge directory Attorney directory Motion-type research Monthly insights Help · About the dataset About DecisionDepot

Disclaimer

DecisionDepot is for informational use only. Not legal advice. Always verify against the source ruling before relying on any analysis.

Live data

Loading…

Explore

New case filings Monitored counties + coverage Judge directory Attorney directory Motion-type research Monthly insights Help · About the dataset About DecisionDepot

Disclaimer

DecisionDepot is for informational use only. Not legal advice. Always verify against the source ruling before relying on any analysis.

Case	County / Judge	Motion	Ruling	Indexed	Hearing

Live data

19,375 rulings indexed. Last ingest about 2 hours ago.

Data refreshes about every 15 minutes during California business hours.

Explore

New case filings Monitored counties + coverage Judge directory Attorney directory Motion-type research Monthly insights Help · About the dataset About DecisionDepot

Disclaimer

DecisionDepot is for informational use only. Not legal advice. Always verify against the source ruling before relying on any analysis.

Filters

Hearing date

FromTo

Browse California tentative rulings

Name: California Superior Court Tentative Rulings
Creator: DecisionDepot
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

3 rulings matching “Violation of Civil Code Section 1796.5”

CSV

Case	County / Judge	Motion	Ruling	Indexed	Hearing
CIVSB2502290 JORGE ALBERTO ESPARZA v. MERCEDES-BENZ USA, LLC, ET AL.	sanbernardino · Civil Joseph B. Widman	Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings

DENIED

May 18, 2026

May 13, 2026

CVRI2407127

MARQUEZ VS MERCEDES-BENZ USA, LLC.

riverside · Civil

MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES

The Court grants the motion in part. Plaintiff is awarded $33,202.50 in fees and $1,773.60 in costs.

Jun 8, 2026

Jun 9, 2026

CVME2402823

MOTON VS GIBSON

riverside · Civil

MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER ANSWERS/RESPONSES TO INTERROGATORIES; FURTHER RESPONSES TO FORM INTERROGATORY 15.1; MOTION TO COMPEL COMPLIANCE

The Court denies Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Further Responses to FROG No. 15.1 and denies Plaintiff’s Request for Monetary Sanctions. The Court continues the hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Compliance.

Jun 8, 2026

Jun 9, 2026