Case	County / Judge	Motion	Ruling	Indexed	Hearing

Live data

25,358 rulings indexed. Last ingest 35 minutes ago.

Data refreshes about every 15 minutes during California business hours.

Explore

New case filings Monitored counties + coverage Judge directory Attorney directory Motion-type research Monthly insights Help · About the dataset About DecisionDepot

Disclaimer

DecisionDepot is for informational use only. Not legal advice. Always verify against the source ruling before relying on any analysis.

Live data

Loading…

Explore

New case filings Monitored counties + coverage Judge directory Attorney directory Motion-type research Monthly insights Help · About the dataset About DecisionDepot

Disclaimer

DecisionDepot is for informational use only. Not legal advice. Always verify against the source ruling before relying on any analysis.

Case	County / Judge	Motion	Ruling	Indexed	Hearing

Live data

25,358 rulings indexed. Last ingest 35 minutes ago.

Data refreshes about every 15 minutes during California business hours.

Explore

New case filings Monitored counties + coverage Judge directory Attorney directory Motion-type research Monthly insights Help · About the dataset About DecisionDepot

Disclaimer

DecisionDepot is for informational use only. Not legal advice. Always verify against the source ruling before relying on any analysis.

Filters

Hearing date

FromTo

Browse California tentative rulings

Name: California Superior Court Tentative Rulings
Creator: DecisionDepot
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

1 ruling

CSV

Case	County / Judge	Motion	Ruling	Indexed	Hearing
26CV191918 DAVIS, vs PALMER,, et al.

alameda · Civil

Han N. Tran

Motion for Protective Order; Temporary Restraining Order and Order to Show Cause Why A Preliminary Injunction Should Not Issue

GRANTED IN PART. The court will modify Plaintiff’s proposed order to clarify that neither party may move forward with a sale of the Property while Plaintiff’s request for preliminary injunction is pending.

Jun 30, 2026