Motion to be Relieved as Counsel
24CV008341: CARRIZALEZ vs NOR CAL TACO, INC., 10/24/2025 Hearing on Motion to be Relieved as Counsel in Department 22
Tentative Ruling
** Due to the Courts schedule, oral argument shall be heard on October 31, 2025 at 9:00 a.m. **
Counsel Bruce Timm on behalf of Boutin Jones, Inc., seeks to be relieved as counsel for Defendants Nor Cal Taco, Inc., dba Chandos Tacos Fair Oaks, Chandos Roseville, Inc., Chandos Elk Grove, Inc., and Chandos Citrus Heights, LLC (Defendants). Counsel attests that Defendants failure to effectively communicate with counsel has rendered it unreasonably difficult to carry out representation and made it impossible for counsel to continue representing Defendants. (Timm Decl., ¶ 2; Attachment 2.)
Counsel attests that he served Defendants by mail at their last known address. (Id., ¶ 3(a)(2).) Counsel explains that he sent an email correspondence to the owner of Defendants, Lisandro Madrigal, on August 29, 2025, confirming the service addresses for the agents for service of process for all Defendants [and] copied two other representatives of Defendants on that email, Xiomara Madrigal and Joey Heredia. While [Counsel] did not receive a response, Defendants are aware this motion is being filed and will also receive a courtesy copy of the motion via email. (Id., ¶ 3(b)(1)(d).)
Counsels description fails to explain how he confirmed the addresses for Defendants agents for service of process as current when he did not receive a response. Accordingly, the Parties APPEARANCE IS REQUIRED and Moving Counsel shall be prepared to provide additional explanation.
Counsels motion to be relieved is UNOPPOSED and GRANTED, subject to Counsels supplemental explanation. The Court will sign the Order submitted with Counsels moving papers.
The Court has ordered the Parties appearance. The Parties are encouraged to appear via Zoom with the links below:
To join by Zoom link - https://saccourt-ca-gov.zoomgov.com/my/sscdept22 To join by phone dial (833) 568-8864 ID 16184738886
Parties requesting services of a court reporter may arrange for private court reporter services at their own expense, pursuant to Government code §68086 and California Rules of Court, Rule 2.956
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
24CV008341: CARRIZALEZ vs NOR CAL TACO, INC., 10/24/2025 Hearing on Motion to be Relieved as Counsel in Department 22
If you are not using a reporter from the Courts Approved Official Reporter Pro Tempore list, a Stipulation and Appointment of Official Reporter Pro Tempore (CV/E-206) must be signed by each party, the private court reporter, and the Judge. The signed form must be filed with the clerk prior to the hearing.
If a litigant has been granted a fee waiver and requests a court reporter, the party must submit a Request for Court Reporter by a Party with a Fee Waiver (CV/E-211). The form must be filed with the clerk at least 10 days prior to the hearing or at the time the hearing is scheduled if less than 10 days away. Once approved, the clerk will forward the form to the Court Reporters Office and an official reporter will be provided.
Moving Counsel is directed to notice all parties of this order.
Please note that the Complex Civil Case Department now provides information to assist you in managing your complex case on the Court website at https://www.saccourt.ca.gov/civil/complex-civil-cases.aspx. The Court strongly encourages parties to review this website regularly to stay abreast of the most recent complex civil case procedures. Please refer to the website before directly contacting the Court Clerk for information.