DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
2025CUBC039219·ventura·Civil·Discovery Dispute
Hearing 3 months agoDENIED AS MOOT

RONALD FAIR vs FORD MOTOR COMPANY, A DELAWARE CORPORATION, et al.

Plaintiff’s Motion for An Order Deeming Admissions Admitted and for Sanctions; Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Responses to Requests for Production of Documents, and Request for Sanctions; Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Responses to Form Interrogatories, and Request for Sanctions; Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Responses to Special Interrogatories, and Request for Sanctions

Hearing date
Jun 11, 2026
Department
44
Prevailing
Defendant

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Discovery rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffRONALD FAIR
DefendantFORD MOTOR COMPANY

Ruling

2025CUBC039219: RONALD FAIR vs FORD MOTOR COMPANY, A DELAWARE CORPORATION, et al. 06/11/2026 in Department 44 Motion to Compel RESPONSES TO REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS, AND REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS

Effective January 5, 2026, Judge Charmaine H. Buehner and all cases previously assigned to Department J4 at the Juvenile Justice Center in Oxnard transferred to Department 44, located at the Hall of Justice, 800 South Victoria Avenue, Ventura, California 93009.

Department Rules. Parties and counsel shall follow the Department 44 rules and Zoom protocols, available at https://www2.ventura.courts.ca.gov/Courtroom/C44.

Remote Appearances. The Court allows Zoom appearances as a courtesy to parties and counsel. The Court does not accommodate Court Call appearances. You MUST register by 4:00 p.m. the court day before your hearing or you will be DENIED entry to the hearing:

ZOOM Registration Link:

https://ventura-courts-ca.zoom.us/meeting/register/iqN7uhQSQMuOqs-9TQXgEQ

No advance notice is required to appear in person.

Tentative Rulings. Oral argument should address the tentative decision. To submit on the tentative decision, email courtroom44@ventura.courts.ca.gov before 8:00 a.m. on the hearing date, copying all other parties, Use the subject line “SUBMISSION ON TENTATIVE”, [Case Number], [Case Title] and [Party]. If not all parties submit, the hearing will proceed, and the tentative ruling may change.

The Court may adopt, modify or reject the tentative ruling after hearing. The tentative ruling has no legal effect unless and until adopted by the Court.

Motions: (1) Plaintiff’s Motion for An Order Deeming Admissions Admitted and for Sanctions (2) Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Responses to Requests for Production of Documents, and Request for Sanctions (3) Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Responses to Form Interrogatories, and Request for Sanctions (4) Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Responses to Special Interrogatories, and Request for Sanctions

2025CUBC039219: RONALD FAIR vs FORD MOTOR COMPANY, A DELAWARE CORPORATION, et al.

Tentative Ruling

The motions are DENIED AS MOOT. Defendant Ford Motor Company’s served verified responses on November 26, 2025. Although the Court has the discretion to award sanctions (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1348, subd. (a)), it declines to do so here. In this case, the motions were filed on November 20, 2025, one day after the discovery responses were due. Defendant promptly served responses within a week of being served with the motions, then served the verifications within two weeks of service of the responses. The plain language of the Code provides that Defendant has waived objections (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 2030.290, subd. (a), 2031.300, subd. (a), 2033.280, subd. (a)). To the extent Defendant has asserted objections, Defendant may seek relief of court on the waiver issue.

Plaintiff’s counsel is ordered to give notice of the Court’s ruling.

2

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share