Motion to Specially Set Hearing
the stay is not in default in proceeding with such arbitration.
(9 U.S.C., § 3.)
Here, the court has granted the motion to compel arbitration and ordered arbitration. Therefore, it must also order a stay of these proceedings pending completion of the arbitration.
Defendant shall give notice of this ruling.
3 Farooquee vs. Cinderella Motion to Specially Set Hearing Cakes Defendant Cinderella Cakes’ Motion for an Order to Specially Set Hearing Date on or Within 30 30-2024-01423993 Days of Trial on Motion for Summary Judgment/Adjudication or, in the Alternative, to Continue Trial Date is taken OFF CALENDAR pursuant Defendant’s Notice of Withdrawal of Motion for an Order to Specially Set Hearing Date on or Withing 30 Days of Trial on Motion for Summary Judgment/Adjudication filed on June 4, 2026 (ROA #103).
4 Othman vs. Monetiva Inc. Motion to Confirm Validity of Service
Plaintiff Tarek Othman’s Motion to Confirm Validity 30-2025-01511444 of Prior Service on Defendant EndlessOne Global Inc. Via Nevada Secretary of State Pursuant to Nev. Rev. Stat. § 14.030 is DENIED.
Plaintiff Tarek Othman’s Motion for Ordering [sic] Authorizing Service of Defendant EndlessOne Global Inc. Via Nevada [or California] Secretary of State is GRANTED.
The court ORDERS that service may be effectuated upon Defendant EndlessOne Global Inc. by personal delivery to the California Secretary of State or to an assistant or deputy secretary of state of one copy of the process and this order.
The court further ORDERS that California Secretary of State or her agents shall send the process to EndlessOne Global Inc., 1800 East
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”