DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
24CV089020·alameda·Civil·Civil
Hearing 3 months agoDENIED

HIDALGO vs TRUSTEE OF THE VALLE REVOCABLE TRUST, et al.

Motion for Leave to Amend; Motion for leave to file first amended complaint

Hearing date
Jun 11, 2026
Department
520
Prevailing
Defendant
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffCherryl Hidalgo
DefendantTrustee of the Valle Revocable Trust

Ruling

24CV089020: HIDALGO vs TRUSTEE OF THE VALLE REVOCABLE TRUST, et al. 06/11/2026 Hearing on Motion for Leave to Amend Motion for leave to file first amended complaint; filed by Cherryl Hidalgo (Plaintiff) CRS# 003538480998 in Department 520

Tentative Ruling - 06/10/2026 Jamilah A. Jefferson

The Notice of Motion and Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint filed by Cherryl Hidalgo on 05/08/2026 is Denied.

Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint is DENIED. Motion was not properly served on Defendants. There is no proof of service attached to the moving papers or separately filed.

The Court notes that Plaintiff appears to have a different mailing address than the one listed in the Court's internal system. Plaintiff must update their current mailing address to received documents and correspondence from the Court.

Trial remains as set - June 18, 2026.

NOTICE: This tentative ruling will automatically become the court’s final order on June 11, 2026 unless, by no later than 4:00 P.M. on June 12, 2026, a party to the action notifies BOTH: 1) the court by emailing Dept520@alameda.courts.ca.gov; AND 2) all opposing counsel or selfrepresented parties (by telephone or email) that the party is contesting this tentative ruling.

The subject line (RE:) of the email must state: “Request for CONTESTED HEARING: [the case name], [number].” When a party emails to contest a tentative ruling, the party must identify the specific holding(s) within the ruling they wish to contest via oral argument.

The court does not provide court reporters for hearings in civil departments. A party who wants a record of the proceedings must engage a private court reporter. (Local Rule 3.95.) Any privately retained court reporter must also participate via video conference. Their email must be provided to the court at the time the Notice of Contest is emailed.

ALL CONTESTED LAW AND MOTION HEARINGS ARE CONDUCTED VIA REMOTE VIDEO unless an in person appearance is required by the court. Invitations to participate in the video proceeding will be sent by the court upon receipt of timely notice of contest. A party may give email notice that they will appear in court in person for the hearing, however all other counsel/parties and the JUDGE MAY APPEAR REMOTELY.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share