ROGERS VS COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
PETITION FOR ORDER RELIEVING PETITIONER FROM GOVERNMENT CLAIMS ACT REQUIREMENTS
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
4. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME CAPITAL ONE, N.A., DEFENDANT'S NOTICE OF MOTION SUCCESSOR BY MERGER AND MOTION TO COMPEL CVPS2602272 TO DISCOVER BANK VS ARBITRATION AND STAY DICINI PROCEEDINGS Tentative Ruling: No tentative ruling. The motion does not comply with Local Rule 3316C. Parties wishing to argue the motion are ordered to appear. Appearance may be telephonic.
5. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME HEARING ON PETITION FOR ORDER RELIEVING PETITIONER FROM ROGERS VS COUNTY OF CVPS2602782 GOVERNMENT CLAIMS ACT RIVERSIDE REQUIREMENTS (GOV. CODE SECTION 946.6) Tentative Ruling: The petition for relief from Government Claims Act requirements filed by Wanda Denise Rogers is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. There is no indication petitioner has served respondents the County of Riverside and the Riverside County Department of Social Services with copies of the petition.
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”