MOTION TO DEEM REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS AS ADMITTED
1. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME HEADWAY CAPITAL, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY VS MOTION TO DEEM REQUEST FOR
THE DAQUINO TEAM LLC, ADMISSIONS AS ADMITTED A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY Tentative Ruling: Motion is unopposed. Motion is GRANTED. Requests for Admission propounded on 10/08/2025 are deemed admitted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant shall pay court costs to Plaintiff in the amount of $60.00 within 30 days after service of this order. Court to sign the proposed order.
2. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME PODS ENTERPRISES, LLC VS BUILDERS MOTION TO SET ASIDE ON CVME2505170 INNOVATION GROUP, A COMPLAINT CORPORATION Tentative Ruling: Motion unopposed. Motion GRANTED. Answer filed with the Defendant’s motion will be filed with the court. The case is returned to active status.
Court will set a trial setting conference for October 8, 2026 at 8:00 a.m, Dept. M205, Remote appearance is allowed for all parties and attorneys. Parties are encouraged to meet and confer.
The court is empowered to relieve a party “upon any terms as may be just ... from a judgment, dismissal, order, or other proceeding taken against him or her through his or her mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect.” (C.C.P. §473(b).) Because the law favors judgments on the merits, “doubts must be resolved in favor of relief....” (Lasalle v. Vogel (2019) 36 Cal.App.5th 127, 134.)
3. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME RIZE CREDIT UNION VS MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE CVME2513348 WINTERS PLEADINGS Tentative Ruling:
Moving party: Plaintiff Rize Credit Union Responding party: Defendant Jacob Winters
Motion filed: 04/28/2026 Opp. filed: 05/29/2026 Reply filed: 06/04/2026
Meet and Confer requirement: C.C.P. § 439 requires a meet and confer in person, by telephone, or by videoconference at least five days before filing a motion for judgment on the pleadings.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”