Status Conference
108 Mical vs. Prime Healthcare La Palma, LLC
2022-01292457
Case Management Conference 109 Jamal vs. DB Glboal, Inc.
2024-01396853 Motion for Approval of Preliminary Class Settlement
Plaintiff Rima Jamal’s Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action and PAGA Settlement is CONTINUED to September 17, 2026 at 2:00 p.m. in Department CX102 in order to give Class Counsel an opportunity to address the issues identified below.
This is a putative wage-and-hour class action and PAGA matter.
On 4/30/2024, Plaintiff Rima Jamal, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, filed a class action complaint against Defendants DB Glboal [sic], Inc. and Right at Home, LLC, alleging various Labor Code wage-and-hour violations and unfair business practices. (ROA #2.)
On 6/26/2024, Plaintiff filed a form Amendment to the Complaint, correcting the name of the first defendant to DB Global, Inc. (ROA #25.) On 7/2/2024, the Court entered the order approving the amendment. (ROA #26.)
On 7/9/2024, Defendant DB Global, Inc. dba Right at Home and Defendant Right at Home, LLC answered. (ROA #31, 34.)
On 5/13/2025, the Court took notice that Plaintiff’s PAGA action against the same defendants is a related case: Jamal v. DB Global, Inc., OCSC Case No. 2024-01411993. (ROA #51.) That action was filed on 7/5/2024, alleging a single cause of action for PAGA penalties. (ROA #2 in Case No. 2024- 01411993.) On 9/4/2024, Defendant DB Global, Inc. dba Right at Home answered. (ROA #15 in Case No. 2024-01411993.)
On 1/28/2026, Plaintiff filed the instant Motion for Preliminary Approval of the Class Action and PAGA Settlement in the instant case, and submitted the Settlement Agreement and Stipulation to Resolve Class Action and PAGA Claims (“Settlement Agreement”) and Class Notice for the Court’s review. The motion seeks preliminary approval of the parties’ proposed settlement of Plaintiff’s class and PAGA claims for the non-reversionary gross settlement amount (GSA) of $300,000. The GSA includes $30,000 allocated for PAGA penalties.
papers must also be filed at least sixteen (16) court days before the Final Approval hearing date.
3. The proposed order should specify the Court’s continuing jurisdiction pursuant to both California Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6 and California Rules of Court, rule 3.769
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
The Court further refers Class Counsel to the “Guidelines for Approval of Class Action Settlements & PAGA Settlements” posted on the Court’s website for Department CX102, available at https://voypubapps.occourts.org/complex-civil-calendar.
Class Counsel must file supplemental papers addressing the Court’s concerns no later than sixteen (16) court days prior to the continued hearing date. Counsel must also provide redlined versions of all revised papers and an explanation of how the pending issues were resolved with precise citation to any revisions. A supplemental declaration or brief that simply asserts the issues have been resolved is insufficient and will result in a further continuance.
Plaintiff is ordered to give notice of this Court’s ruling, including to the LWDA, within five (5) court days, and file proof of service. 110 Jamal vs. DB Glboal, Inc.
2024-01411993 Status Conference 111 Logue vs. JHA Remediation LLC
2024-01401183 1. Motion for Approval of PAGA Settlement 2. Status Conference 3. Order to Show Cause re: Monetary Sanctions for Plaintiff’s FTA
OSC:
The Court finds that Plaintiff’s counsel has provided substantial justification for failure to appear at the 3/26/2026 case management conference. (See ROA #145.) Therefore, the Court VACATES the OSC re: Monetary Sanctions for Plaintiff’s Failure to Appear.
APPROVAL MOTION:
Plaintiff Corey Logue and Defendants’ JHA Remediation, LLC and JHA Environmental, Inc.’s joint Motion for Approval of PAGA Settlement is