Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel of Record; Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel of Record
therefore, Cross-Complainant proceeded with the deposition. (Levine Decl., ¶ 2, 4.) However, neither Milan nor his counsel appeared for the continued deposition and Cross-Complainant had to take an Affidavit of Nonappearance. (Levine Decl., ¶ 4.)
Milan has opposed the Motion and states on January 21, 2026 (after the filing of this Motion), Milan’s counsel provided dates for the continued deposition and that Milan remains available for his deposition.
Milan is ORDERED to appear for his deposition on a mutually convenient date within 10-days of the service of this order.
Milan is also ORDERED to pay $1,636.20 in sanctions to Cross- Complainant within 30-days of the date of service of the notice of this order.
Moving party to give notice. 15 23-01333121 1) Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel of Record 2) Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel of Record Takashima vs. Lin The motions of Uplift Law PC to withdraw as attorney of record for Defendants Russell Lin and Virus International are DENIED. Uplift Law provides a declaration from its paralegal stating the mandatory form Order Granting Attorney’s Motion To Be Relieved As Counsel-Civil (MC-053) was served on Defendants along with the other moving papers. However, the Court ordered counsel to file the missing orders as well. Counsel failed to do so after being given three chances to properly file its motions. Thus, the Court denies Uplift Law’s 1. motions as procedurally defective for its failure to comply with California Rules of Court, rule 3.1362(e).
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”