Request for Order – Attorney’s Fees; Bifurcation; Case Management; Discovery
Gloria Perdomo (Mother) filed a request for guideline child support for two minor children: Angel Jesus Vicente Velasquez (DOB 05/19/2013) and Irma Isabel Vicente Velasquez (06/17/2015). Florencio Vicente Osorio (Father) has not filed a responsive declaration.
The parties married August 20, 2020. They separated April 8, 2023. Judgment of dissolution was entered March 1, 2024, leaving child support as a reserved issue.
As part of her Request for Order, Mother filed an Income and Expense Declaration. Father has not filed any materials with this Court.
Father is directed to this Court’s Legal Self Help Center to receive guidance on how to respond to a request for child support. Mother is directed to provide financial documents in support of her declaration consistent with the requirements of Local Rule 7.13.
The Court will continue this matter to July 2,2026. Failure to provide the required information before July 2, 2026, may result in the Court imputing income to Father in determining guideline child support.
As authorized by CRC Rule 5.125, the Court shall prepare the findings and order after hearing.
Parties must comply with Marin County Superior Court Local Rules, Rule 7.12(B), (C), which provide that if a party wants to present oral argument, the party must contact the Court at (415) 444-7046 and all opposing parties by 4:00 p.m. the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. Notice may be by telephone or in person to all other parties that argument is being requested (i.e., it is not necessary to speak with counsel or parties directly.) Unless the Court and all
parties have been notified of a request to present oral argument, no oral argument will be permitted except by order of the Court. In the event no party requests oral argument in accordance with Rule 7.12(C), the tentative ruling shall become the order of the court.
IT IS ORDERED that evidentiary hearings shall be in-person in Department B. For routine appearances, the parties may access Department B for video conference via a link on the court website. Litigants in the virtual courtroom are required to leave the video screen on and wait for your case to be called.
FURTHER ORDERED that the parties are responsible for ensuring that they have a good connection and that they are available for the hearing. If the connection is inadequate, the Court may proceed with the hearing in the party’s absence.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”