DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
26CV-02511·merced·Civil·Civil
Hearing 3 months agoGRANTED

AgWest Farm Credit, PCA, et al. vs Hundal Farms, Inc., et al.

Motion for (1) Appointment of Receiver and (2) Preliminary Injunction in Aid of Receiver

Hearing date
Jun 4, 2026
Department
8
Prevailing
Plaintiff

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Ruling

26CV-02511 AgWest Farm Credit, PCA, et al. vs Hundal Farms, Inc., et al.

Motion for (1) Appointment of Receiver and (2) Preliminary Injunction in Aid of Receiver

Appearance required. A notice of stay of proceedings was filed by Plaintiff’s counsel on June 2, 2026, however no documents were attached to indicate what type of court filing ostensibly induced the stay of local proceedings. Appear to address the stay and to schedule a status hearing, pending the resolution of the related matter.

*** In the event a stay is not appropriate, required, or approved by this Court, depending on the nature of the ancillary court filing ostensibly giving rise to a stay of local proceedings, Plaintiff’s motion will be heard as originally calendared. The tentative ruling for this motion is reflected below:

Plaintiff’s unopposed motion for appointment of receiver and preliminary injunction in aid of receiver is GRANTED.

Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 564, subdivisions (b)(2), (b)(9), and (b)(11), the Court finds good cause to appoint a receiver, and that proposed receiver Randy Sugarman is qualified for appointment as receiver.

Further, the Court finds the preliminary injunction in aid of receiver is appropriate in these circumstances.

The Court will sign the order lodged with the court on May 5, 2026.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share