MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT ON 1ST AMENDED COMPLAINT
Browse all Motion for Final Approval of Class Settlement rulings statewide →
1. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF TRCKA VS ROTOCO, CVRI2304897 CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT ON LLC 1ST AMENDED COMPLAINT Tentative Ruling: Appearances requested to discuss:
1. the amount of the service award to plaintiff Trcka. Essentially the service award is the settlement offered that Trcka said was “extremely difficult” to turn down. If this award is approved, he will receive more than that offer (and his wage and hour claims appear to be quite small--$154.35 compared to the average of $919.42).
2. How to treat the untimely requests for exclusion.
2. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME MILLER VS SNAP! CVRI2406245 DISCOVERY MOTIONS (14) MOBILE, INC. Tentative Ruling: Appearances requested to discuss selection of discovery referee.
3. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME DEJESUS VS DR. JAVIER MOTION TO COMPEL CVRI2505885 RIOS, A MEDICAL ARBITRATION CORPORATION Tentative Ruling: Appearances requested to discuss the evidence of plaintiff DeJesus’s signature attached to the Espinoza declaration filed with the reply papers and plaintiff’s objection to the declaration.
4. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME GARCIA VS ALTMAN MOTION TO COMPEL CVRI2506352 SPECIALTY PLANTS, ARBITRATION LLC Tentative Ruling: No tentative ruling; appearances requested to confirm that no opposition to the motion has been filed.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”