DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
2025-01500937·orange·ComplexCivil·Civil
Hearing 3 months agoCMC CONTINUED AND MTC HEARING VACATED

Garibay Silva vs. Nieves Landscape, Inc.

Case Management Conference; Motion to Compel Arbitration

Hearing date
Jun 4, 2026
Department
CX102
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffGaribay Silva
DefendantNieves Landscape, Inc.

Ruling

103 Garibay Silva 1. Case Management Conference vs. Nieves 2. Motion to Compel Arbitration Landscape, Inc., a California CMC CONTINUED AND MTC HEARING VACATED corporation

2025- 01500937

105 CARMONA vs.

1. Motion Other To Exclude Testimony re Class Cert ARROWHEAD 2. Motion to Certify Class PRODUCTS 3. Status Conference CORPORATION Having read and considered the parties' Joint Case Management Conference Statement (ROA 146), it is hereby ordered that the June 4, 2026, hearing set 2022- for defendant’s motion is VACATED. 01295275 The CMC is continued to August 6, 2026 at 2PM in CX102. The parties shall submit a joint CMC statement 10 days in advance

Clerk to give notice.

106 Quinn vs.

1. Case Management Conference Valley Post- 2. Motion to Compel Answers to Form Interrogatories Acute And 3. Motion to Compel Answers to Form Interrogatories Rehab LLC 4. Motion to Compel Deposition (Oral or Written) 5. Motion to Compel Production 2025- 6. Motion to Compel Response to Requests for 01518740 Admissions

Motion No. 1: Compel Responses to Form Interrogatories, Set One

Plaintiff Harvey Quinn’s unopposed motion to compel defendant Valley Post- Acute and Rehab, LLC to answer without objection Form Interrogatories, Set One, is GRANTED. Responses are due within 30 days notice of this order, unless the parties agree otherwise.

The court finds no substantial justification or other circumstances which make the imposition of the monetary sanctions unjust. The court awards plaintiff reasonable expenses in the amount of $710.00, payable by defendant Valley Post-Acute and Rehab, LLC within 20 days notice of this order, unless the parties agree otherwise. C.C.P. §§ 2023.010, 2023.030.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share