Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB v.

Plaintiff shall submit a proposed order and shall give notice of this ruling.

3. Keith v. Rosario 25-1481402 The unopposed motion of plaintiffs Luke Campbell Keith, Marshaleen Keith, and Tyler Keith (collectively, Plaintiffs) for leave to file a first amended complaint is GRANTED. (Code Civ. Proc., § 473(a)(1).)

Courts are bound to apply a policy of great liberality in permitting amendments to the complaint “at any stage of the proceedings, up to and including trial,” absent prejudice to the adverse party. (Atkinson v. Elk Corp. (2003) 109 Cal.App.4th 739, 761.)

Plaintiffs have shown the interests of justice would be served by allowing the amendment. In addition, the motion is unopposed.

Accordingly, the motion is GRANTED.

The First Amended Complaint is to be separately filed within 5 days of the date of this order.

Counsel for Plaintiffs is ordered to give notice of this ruling.

4. Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB v. 25-1498917 The motion of plaintiff Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, not in its individual capacity but solely as Owner Trustee for the FLIC Residential Mortgage Loan Trust 1 (Plaintiff) for leave to file a first amended complaint is CONTINUED TO JULY 2, 2026, AT 1:30 P.M. IN DEPARTMENT C20.

The Court’s files do not reflect that any opposition to this motion was filed by defendant Elvin W. L. Mitchell, Jr. (Defendant). However, it appears Defendant served Plaintiff with an opposition because, on May 29, 2026, Plaintiff filed a reply to Defendant’s opposition.

The Court will therefore CONTINUE the hearing on this motion as stated above so that Defendant can file the opposition with the Court.

Defendant is ORDERED to file the same opposition which he previously served on Plaintiff, within 7 days of this order.

Aside from the opposition, no further briefing is permitted.

Counsel for Plaintiff is ordered to give notice of this ruling.

5. Justin J.S.Morgan Law Corporation v. Wood and Delgado 25-1483376 Before the court is a motion to quash brought by Defendants Wood & Delgado, J.P. Wood Law Corporation and Wood Law Corporation as to the subpoena for records issued to Weyer, Crelling & Custer. The motion is GRANTED and the request for sanctions is DENIED, as set forth herein.