Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. vs. Brittney A. Burd
Motion to Deem Requests for Admissions Admitted
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
This is a collections case. Before the Court this day is an unopposed motion to deem RFAs admitted. The motion cannot be heard this day because the proof of service accompanying the motion contains the wrong address for defense counsel, arguably explaining why the motion is unopposed. In fact, upon close inspection, it appears that the discovery itself was mailed to the wrong suite number, which may explain the “radio silence” from defense counsel. It appears to this Court that plaintiff will ha ve to start all over with this discovery effort.
Cited authorities
Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.