DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
24CECG04090·fresno·Civil·Personal Injury
Hearing 3 months agoGRANTED

P.C., a minor, by and through this Guardian ad litem, Salina Colin v. Fresno Unified School District et al.

Petition to Compromise Minor’s Claim

Hearing date
Jun 2, 2026
Department
403
Judge
Prevailing
Moving Party
Next hearing
Aug 26, 2026
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffP.C.
PlaintiffSalina Colin
DefendantFresno Unified School District

Ruling

(48)

Tentative Ruling

Re: P.C., a minor, by and through this Guardian ad litem, Salina Colin v. Fresno Unified School District et al. Superior Court Case No. 24CECG04090

Hearing Date: June 2, 2026 (Dept. 403)

Motion: Petition to Compromise Minor’s Claim

Tentative Ruling:

To grant. (Code of Civil Proc., § 372; Probate Code, § 2504.) Petitioner is directed to file new proposed orders within five days of service of the order by the clerk. No appearances necessary.

To set a status conference for Wednesday, August 26, 2026, at 3:30 p.m. in Department 502, for confirmation of deposit of the funds into a blocked account. If the Acknowledgment of Receipt of Order and Funds for Deposit in Blocked Account (MC- 356), is filed at least five court days before the hearing, the status conference will come off calendar.

Explanation:

The petition appears to be sufficiently stated and the proposed court order approving the disposition of proceeds appears complete. However, a completed proposed order to deposit funds in a blocked account (MC-355) must be filed.

The court notes that the petition contained a request for all funds to be disbursed to petitioner Salina Colin to provide for plaintiff P.C.’s needs. As the proposed order does not address or reflect such a disposition, the court disregards the request.

Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 3.1312(a), and Code of Civil Procedure section 1019.5, subdivision (a), no further written order is necessary. The minute order adopting this tentative ruling will serve as the order of the court and service by the clerk will constitute notice of the order.

Tentative Ruling

Issued By: lmg on 6-1-26. (Judge’s initials) (Date)

5

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share