DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD26682154·sf·Civil·Unlawful Detainer
Hearing 3 months agoOVERRULED, 5 days to answer from notice of entry of order.

MERCY HOUSING MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC. VS. ANDREA A. PARKER ET AL

DEMURRER to COMPLAINT

Hearing date
Jun 10, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
Plaintiff

Motion type

Browse all Demurrer rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffMERCY HOUSING MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC.
DefendantANDREA A. PARKER

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD26682154 - June 10, 2026 Hearing date: June 10, 2026 Case number: CUD26682154 Case title: MERCY HOUSING MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC. VS. ANDREA A. PARKER ET AL Case Number: | | CUD26682154 | Case Title: | | MERCY HOUSING MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC. VS. ANDREA A. PARKER ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-06-10 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | DEMURRER to COMPLAINT | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for June 10, 2026. Line 13.

DEFENDANT ANDREA PARKER DEMURRER to COMPLAINT is OVERRULED, 5 days to answer from notice of entry of order. Although the Notice to Quit does not provide the date it was served, it does provide a date certain for the termination of tenancy should the tenants fail to surrender possession as demanded: 4/17/26. From the face of the notice, an ordinary tenant would have reasonably understood that the notice period ended on April 17, 2026. (See Eshagian v. Cepeda (2025) 112 Cal.App.5th 433.)

This matter will be heard in department 505 by the Honorable Michelle Tong at 1:30 p.m. per the order of the presiding judge. =(505/MT) Parties may appear in-person, or via Zoom Video Conference (Meeting ID: 160 4132 4666 Passcode: 872834).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share