Beverly Stanton v. Dean Sorensen et al.

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 10 Honorable Jeffrey B. El-Hajj Blanca Than, Courtroom Clerk 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: 408-882-2210

DATE: June 4, 2026 TIME: 9:00 A.M. / 9:01 A.M. To contest the ruling, call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 P.M. Make sure to let the other side know before 4:00 P.M. that you plan to contest the ruling. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1308(a)(1); Local Rule 8.D.)

**Please specify the issue to be contested when calling the Court and counsel**

9:00 A.M. LINE # CASE # CASE TITLE RULING Line 1 24CV436319 Brandon Giraldo v. Click LINE 1 or scroll down for ruling. Phuc Nguyen et al. Line 2 24CV436319 Brandon Giraldo v. Click LINE 1 or scroll down for ruling. Phuc Nguyen et al Line 3 24CV451766 Creditors Adjustment Click LINE 3 or scroll down for ruling. Bureau, Inc. v. JTAI Entertainment 1 & 2, LLC et al. Line 4 25CV459561 Beverly Stanton v. Defendant DHL Express (USA), Inc.’s motion to compel the deposition Dean Sorensen et al. of plaintiff Beverly Stanton. (Code Civ.

Proc., § 2025.450.) Notice is proper and the motion is opposed by plaintiff. Plaintiff did not attend the noticed deposition, which was noticed before individual defendant Dean Sorensen was served. Sorensen was served by publication, answered the complaint in April 2026, and is now represented by the same counsel as DHL Express (USA), Inc. Plaintiff’s deposition is now scheduled for June 5, 2026. The court disagrees with plaintiff that the motion is moot, given that the deposition has not taken place yet.

The motion is GRANTED; plaintiff must appear for the scheduled deposition. But the court denies DHL Express (USA), Inc.’s request for sanctions. Under the circumstances of this case, the court finds substantial justification for plaintiff’s delay in agreeing to a deposition date. The court will prepare the order.

2