DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
23CV00563·santacruz·Civil·Civil
Hearing 3 months agoGRANTED

EVANS v. BEAR CREEK CANYON ROAD ASSOCIATION, INC., et al.

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

Hearing date
Jun 5, 2026
Department
Judge
Prevailing
Plaintiff

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffEVANS
DefendantBEAR CREEK CANYON ROAD ASSOCIATION, INC.

Ruling

LAW AND MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS DATE: JUNE 5, 2026 TIME: 8:30 A.M.

TENTATIVE RULINGS ARE NOT POSTED IN UNLAWFUL DETAINER CASES

Notice to prevailing parties: Local Rule 2.10.01 requires you to submit a proposed formal order incorporating, verbatim, the language of any tentative ruling – or attaching and incorporating the tentative by reference - or an order consistent with the announced ruling of the Court, in accordance with California Rule of Court 3.1312. Such proposed order is required even if the prevailing party submitted a proposed order prior to the hearing with two exceptions: (1) in unopposed matters where the moving party has provided a detailed proposed order or JCC form of order, or (2) where the tentative is simply to “grant”. Failure to comply with Local Rule 2.10.01 may result in the imposition of sanctions following an order to show cause hearing, if a proposed order is not timely filed.

No. 23CV00563

EVANS v. BEAR CREEK CANYON ROAD ASSOCIATION, INC., et al.

(UNOPPOSED) PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

The unopposed motion is granted. Plaintiff shall file his second amended complaint no later than June 18, 2026.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share