DecisionDepot
California Legal Research
All cases
24PR00504·santabarbara·Civil·Conservatorship
As a result of the failure to file the accounting, the court may remove the conservator, cite the conservator for contempt of court, suspend the powers of the conservator, appoint a temporary conservator to take hold of the assets, and recommend surcharge.

Conservatorship of Liliana Gonzalez

First Accounting and Report of Conservator

Hearing date
May 12, 2026
Department
Prevailing
N/A

Ruling

Court records show that an Accounting is due (See Prob. Code, § 2620), but there is no accounting on file. The Court ordered the accounting on October 1, 2021. According to the order, the Accounting should have been filed for review by September 12, 2022, which is 15 days before the hearing. The Notice to File an Accounting was issued pursuant to Probate Code section 2620.2 on March 3, 2026, served on March 6, 2026, requiring the accounting be filed within 30 days of that notice. The accounting is still not on file. As a result of the failure to file the accounting, the court may remove the conservator (Prob. Code, §2620.2(b)(1)), cite the conservator for contempt of court (Prob. Code, §2620.2(b)(2)), suspend the powers of the conservator, appoint a temporary conservator to take hold of the assets, and recommend surcharge (Prob. Code, §2620.2(b)(3)), and/or appoint legal counsel for the conservatee and compensate counsel via surcharge to the conservator (Prob. Code, §2620.2(b)(4)). If the estate qualifies, the conservator may request an order dispensing with accountings pursuant to Probate Code section 2628. This may often be accomplished by submission of a declaration (Judicial Council Form MC-030) ex parte. As the Court's representative, the Court Investigator is required to visit the conservatee to make advisements and determine ongoing need in accordance with Probate Code section 1851. The Court Investigator must be served with a copy of the accounting. In Santa Maria, it should be sent to 312-C E. Cook Street, Santa Maria, CA 93454.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…

Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Source

Share