DecisionDepot
California Legal Research
All cases
FDV-22-816219·sf·FamilyLaw·Child Custody / Visitation
The parties are ordered to appear at 9am on 5/14/2026 in Department 404 in person or via Zoom video.

Steve Dukes v. Alona Abalayan Dukes

Request for Order Temporary Emergency Order; Child Custody; Visitation (Parenting Time); Order Shortening Time

Hearing date
May 14, 2026
Department
404
Judge
Prevailing
N/A

Parties

PetitionerSteve Dukes
RespondentAlona Abalayan Dukes

Ruling

This Court has jurisdiction to make child custody orders in this case under the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act. A violation of this order may subject the party in 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 violation to civil or criminal penalties, or both. The country of habitual residence of the minor child is the United States. 2) The Court will maintain the current order for temporary sole legal and sole physical custody to Mother, with parenting time for Father as set forth in the Findings and Order After Hearing from the 2/17/2026 hearing, filed 2/18/2026. 3) If either party wishes to change the current custody or parenting time order, they may file a new request for order. 4) The Court will prepare the Findings and Order After Hearing. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO UNIFIED FAMILY COURT

MARGARITA N PRIKHODKO, Petitioner VS. ALEXANDER KAMIL, Respondent ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case Number: FMS-20-387303 Hearing Date: May 14, 2026 Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Department: 404 Presiding: AI MORI

REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGE TEMPORARY EMERGENCY ORDER, CHILD CUSTODY, VISITATION (PARENTING TIME), ORDER SHORTENING TIME TRANSFER BENEFITS/ MODIFICATION CUSDODY ORDERS TENTATIVE RULING

The parties are ordered to appear at 9am on 5/14/2026 in Department 404 in person or via Zoom video.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…

Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Source

Share