DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
RG17876798·alameda·Civil·Civil Litigation
Hearing 3 months agoDENIED

Poole v. Twin Hill Acquisition Company, Inc.

Motion to Sever

Hearing date
Jun 10, 2026
Department
21
Prevailing
Plaintiff
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffPoole
DefendantTwin Hill Acquisition Company, Inc.

Ruling

RG17876798: Poole VS Twin Hill Acquisition Company, Inc. 06/10/2026 Hearing on Motion to Sever CRS# 752251585006 in Department 21

Tentative Ruling - 06/09/2026 S. Raj Chatterjee

The Motion to Sever filed by Twin Hill Acquisition Company, Inc. on 04/09/2026 is Denied.

See separate order.

PLEASE NOTE: This tentative ruling will become the ruling of the court if uncontested by 04:00pm the day before your hearing. If you wish to contest the tentative ruling, then both notify opposing counsel directly and the court at the eCourt portal found on the court’s website: www.alameda.courts.ca.gov.

If you have contested the tentative ruling or your tentative ruling reads, “parties to appear,” please use the following link to access your hearing at the appropriate date and time: https://alameda-courts-ca-gov.zoomgov.com/my/department21. If no party has contested the tentative ruling, then no appearance is necessary.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share