DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CV2025-0784·yolo·Civil·Discovery
Hearing 3 months agoDENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Capital One, N.A. v. McKinnon

Motion for order that matters in request for admission of truth of facts be deemed admitted

Hearing date
Jun 9, 2026
Department
Fourteen
Judge
Prevailing
Opposing Party
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffCapital One, N.A.
DefendantMelinda McKinnon

Ruling

Case: Capital One, N.A. v. McKinnon Case No. CV2025-0784 Hearing Date: June 9, 2026 Department Fourteen 9:00 a.m.

Plaintiff Capital One, N.A.’s motion for order that matters in request for admission of truth of facts be deemed admitted is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2033.280.) Plaintiff failed to serve the motion electronically on defendant Melinda McKinnon’s counsel as required. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 2.251(c); Code Civ. Proc., § 1010.6, subd. (i); YCR 7.2.)

The notice of motion does not provide notice of this Court’s tentative ruling system as required by Local Rule 11.2(b). Counsel for moving party, or the moving party if unrepresented by counsel, is ordered to notify the opposing party or parties immediately of the tentative ruling system.

If no hearing is requested, and no party appears at the hearing, this tentative ruling is effective immediately. No formal order pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 3.1312 or further notice is required.

4 of 7

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share