DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
30-2023-01323260·orange·Probate·Probate
Hearing 3 months agoGRANTED

Donaldson – Probate

Motion to Compel; Motion to Compel Further Responses

Hearing date
Jun 3, 2026
Department
CM08
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Discovery rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$1,547.50$2,142.50

Parties

PetitionerDarla Merritt
DefendantEric Donaldson

Ruling

Superior Court of the State of California County of Orange TENTATIVE RULINGS FOR DEPARTMENT CM08 Temporary Judge Catherine Evans

Date: 06/03/2026 Court Room Rules and Notices

# Case Name Tentative 1 Boctor – Trust; 30-2022-01297656

2 Donaldson – Probate; Motions to Compel (2)

Petitioner Darla Merritt’s unopposed Motion for an Order Compelling Eric Donaldson’s Responses to Inspection Demand, Set One (ROA 195) is GRANTED. Eric Donaldson is ORDERED to provide written responses, without objection, to Inspection Demands 1-15 and to produce all documents responsive to each of the requests within 30 days of this order. Petitioner’s request for sanctions in connection with the motion is GRANTED in the amount of $1,547.50 (2.5 hours at $595 per hour plus the $60 motion fee).

Petitioner Darla Merritt’s unopposed Motion for an Order Compelling Eric Donaldson’s Further Responses to Form Interrogatories, Set One (ROA 191) is GRANTED. Eric Donaldson is ORDERED to provide further responses, without objection, to Form Interrogatory 17.1 (for responses to Requests for Admission Nos. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 14, & Exhibit 1) and Form Interrogatory 50.1 within 30 days of this order. Petitioner’s request for sanctions in connection with the motion is GRANTED in the amount of $2,142.50 (3.5 hours at $595 per hour plus the $60 motion fee).

Moving party is directed to give notice.

3 Stuck – Trust; 30-2022-01271247

4 Zablan – Trust; 30-2019-01045409

5 Escarsega – Elder Motion to Compel Abuse; 30-2026-01554714

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share