DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25-01496605·orange·Civil·Discovery
Hearing 3 months agoDENIED

113 1513 Civic Center LLC vs. De Delgado

Motion to Quash

Hearing date
Jun 4, 2026
Department
W15
Prevailing
Opposing Party

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Quash rulings statewide →

Parties

Plaintiff1513 Civic Center LLC
DefendantDe Delgado

Ruling

113 1513 Civic Center LLC vs. Caboraca Investments, Inc.’s Motion to Quash De Delgado, the deposition subpoena that Plaintiff served 25-01496605 on JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., with a production date of October 1, 2025, see ROA 27, came before the Court for a hearing on 04/09/2026. (ROA 82.) In the Court’s Minute Order following the hearing, the Court stated the following:

“Second, the motions filed by 920 North Grand Ave, LLC and Caboraca Investments, Inc. to quash the deposition subpoena that Plaintiff served on JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., with a production date of October 1, 2025 were not served on the witness (Chase) as required pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1985(g). (ROAs 23 and 27.) As stated above, the motion filed by 920 North Grand Ave, LLC is VACATED. Caboraca Investments, Inc.’s motion, however, is CONTINUED TO May 21, 2026 at 1:30 p.m.

Moving party shall filed proof of service on Chase no later than 16 court days before the continued hearing.” (ROA 82 [bold emphasis added].)

As set forth above, the Court ordered that Caboraca Investments, Inc. was to file a proof of service establishing service of its motion to quash the deposition subpoena at issue on Chase no later than 16 court days before the continued hearing.

Caboraca Investments, Inc. failed to file this proof of service and therefore has not complied with the statutory notice requirements pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1985(g).

As such, the motion to quash is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

Moving party to give notice.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share