PETITION FOR COMPROMISE OF DISPUTED CLAIM
1. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME GUZMAN VS PETITION FOR COMPROMISE OF CVMV2604308 WAWANESA DISPUTED CLAIM INSURANCE COMPANY Tentative Ruling:
No Tentative Ruling. Matter to heard in open court. According to case management system, service upon Respondent is not completed.
2. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME MOTION TO COMPEL CVME2402823 MOTON VS GIBSON COMPLIANCE Tentative Ruling:
See 3 below.
3. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME MOTION TO COMPEL: FURTHER ANSWERS/RESPONSES TO CVME2402823 MOTON VS GIBSON INTERROGATORIES FURTHER RESPONSES TO FORM INTERROGATORY 15.1 Tentative Ruling:
Summary of Rulings:
(1) The Court denies Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Further Responses to FROG No. 15.1. The Court denies Plaintiff’s Request for Monetary Sanctions. (2) The Court continues the hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Compliance. The Court orders Defendant to file substantive opposition no later than nine (9) court days before the continued hearing date and any reply no later than five (5) court days before the continued hearing date.
Factual/Procedural Context
Plaintiff Natalie Mary Moton (“Plaintiff”) operates a working ranch in Temecula known as Namaste Farms where she has specialized in the production of wool, fiber, and wool products. (Compl. ¶ 6.) Plaintiff and Defendant Joni Gibson (“Defendant”) are neighbors involved in a related title dispute—Moton v. The Ark, LLC, Case No.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”