DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
26CV166705·alameda·Civil·Employment
Hearing 3 months agoPARTIES TO APPEAR

DUKE vs PHILZ COFFEE, INC.

Motion to Strike; Demurrer

Hearing date
Jun 9, 2026
Department
21
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Strike rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffDUKE
DefendantPHILZ COFFEE, INC.

Ruling

26CV166705: DUKE vs PHILZ COFFEE, INC. 06/09/2026 Hearing on Motion to Strike PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT CRS# A-166705-001 in Department 21

Tentative Ruling - 06/08/2026 S. Raj Chatterjee

PARTIES TO APPEAR on the Demurrer of Philz Coffee to the First Amended Complaint and the motion of Philz Coffee to strike portions of the First Amended Complaint. See separate tentative ruling.

PLEASE NOTE: This tentative ruling will become the ruling of the court if uncontested by 04:00pm the day before your hearing. If you wish to contest the tentative ruling, then both notify opposing counsel directly and the court at the eCourt portal found on the court’s website: www.alameda.courts.ca.gov.

If you have contested the tentative ruling or your tentative ruling reads, “parties to appear,” please use the following link to access your hearing at the appropriate date and time: https://alameda-courts-ca-gov.zoomgov.com/my/department21. If no party has contested the tentative ruling, then no appearance is necessary.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share