Request for Order re: Attorney's Fees and Costs; and Bifurcation of Validity of Prenuptial Agreement; Advance of Funds
1 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 4
5) 6 MARGARET ELLEN O''CONNELL,) Case Number: FDI-23-798529) 7 Petitioner) Hearing Date: June 9, 2026) 8 VS.) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM) 9 MARK ANDREW HEITNER,) Department: 404) 10 Respondent) Presiding: ROGER CHAN) 11) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COSTS; AND BIFURCATION OF 13 VALIDITY OF PRENUPTIAL AGREEMENT; ADVANCE OF FUNDS 14 TENTATIVE RULING 15 The Court has been informed that the parties have an agreement to continue the hearing on Wife’s 16 Request for Order filed 2/13/2026. The parties shall appear in person or by Zoom to select a new 17 date. If a party chooses to appear by Zoom, that party must abide by the Notice and Instructions 18 for Remote Appearance in San Francisco Family Court set forth above. 19
23
27
29
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”