Compliance Hearing re: Dismissal
RG21105169: Ozolins VS Juice Holick, LLC 06/08/2026 Compliance Hearing re: Dismissal in Department 22
Tentative Ruling - 06/05/2026 Han N. Tran
The Court orders the following after review of the case.
A Notice of Settlement was filed on 1/23/23.
A request for dismissal has not been filed even though over three years have passed. No party has filed any status update regarding the settlement in the last three years.
Pursuant to Rules of Court, rule 3.1385(b), (c), this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
Clerk is directed to serve copies of this order, with proof of service, to counsel and to selfrepresented parties of record.
*******************************************************************
IF YOU DO NOT CONTEST THE TENTATIVE RULING AND IF NO OTHER PARTY CONTEST THE TENTATIVE RULING, YOU DO NOT HAVE TO ATTEND THE HEARING AND THE COURT WILL AFFIRM THE TENTATIVE RULING.
IF YOU DO CONTEST THE TENTATIVE RULING, FOLLOW THE PROCEDURE BELOW:
THROUGH eCOURT Notify the Court and all the other parties no later than 4:00 PM one court day before the scheduled hearing, and briefly identify the issues you wish to argue through the following steps:
1. Log into eCourt Public Portal 2. Case Search 3. Enter the Case Number and select Search 4. Select the Case Name 5. Select the Tentative Rulings Tab 6. Select Click to Contest this Ruling 7. Enter your Name and Reason for Contesting 8. Select Proceed
BY EMAIL Send an email to the DEPARTMENT CLERK (dept22@alameda.courts.ca.gov) and all the other parties no later than 4:00 PM one court day before the scheduled hearing. This will permit the RG21105169: Ozolins VS Juice Holick, LLC 06/08/2026 Compliance Hearing re: Dismissal in Department 22 department clerk to send invitations to counsel to appear remotely.
Notice via BOTH eCourt AND email is required. The tentative ruling will become the ruling of the court if no party contests the tentative ruling.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”