Rojas, Jasmine v. Ford Motor Co.

probability, no act or omission attributable to Dr. Juarez caused or contributed to plaintiff’s injuries. (SSUMF No. 7.)

Defendant presents sufficient evidence to support his initial burden of showing entitlement to judgment on plaintiff Haley Gascon’s claim for medical negligence and plaintiff Christopher Gates’ associated claim for loss of consortium.

The burden therefore shifts to plaintiffs to show one or more triable issues of material fact. As plaintiffs submitted no evidence and in fact filed a notice of non-opposition, plaintiffs fall short of their burden.

Based on the foregoing, defendant Richard G. Juarez’s motion for summary judgment is granted.

8. S-CV-0054035 Rojas, Jasmine v. Ford Motor Co.

The motion for attorneys’ fees is dropped from calendar as no moving papers were filed with the court.

9. S-CV-0054693 Pereira, Christine v. Hammerhead Pools

If oral argument is requested, it will be heard on June 16, 2026 at 8:30 a.m. in Department 42 by the Honorable Trisha J. Hirashima.

Petitioner is advised the notice of motion must include notice of the court’s tentative ruling procedures. (Local Rule 20.2.3(C).)

Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award

Petitioner Christine Pereira asks the court to confirm an arbitration award and enter judgment thereon against Hammerhead Pools, LLC. No opposition has been filed.

“A party to an arbitration in which an award has been made may petition the court to confirm, correct or vacate the award. The petition shall name as respondents all parties to the arbitration . . . .” (Code Civ. Proc., § 1285.) Such a petition shall provide the agreement to arbitrate, the name(s) of the arbitrator(s), and the arbitrator’s award. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1285.4.) “If a petition or response under this chapter is duly served and filed, the court shall confirm the award as made, . . . unless in accordance with this chapter it corrects and confirms it as corrected, vacates the award or dismisses the proceeding.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 1286