defendants’ motion to compel responses to special interrogatories
Browse all Motion to Compel Further Responses rulings statewide →
178. Because all requirements for issuance of the writ of possession are met, the court also issues a turnover order.
Conclusion
Based upon the foregoing, the court orders as follows:
1. The court grants Cross-Complainant’s application for a writ of possession.
2. The court issues a turnover order.
3. The court orders that Cross-Complainant is not required to post an undertaking.
4. The court orders that Cross-Defendants post an undertaking of $123,450.00 in order to prevent Cross-Complainant from taking possession of the vehicle.
5. Cross-Complainant’s counsel shall provide notice and file proof of service with the court.
2. CU0002221 Bill Sinor, Jr. vs. B&W Resorts, INC., d.b.a. Harmony Ridge Resorts, et al
No appearances are required. The Court has approved the joint stipulation of the parties filed on May 27, 2026 regarding defendants’ motion to compel responses to special interrogatories.
4
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”