DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25-01479317·orange·Civil·Consumer Protection
Hearing 3 months agoOff Calendar

Hill vs. Hyundai Motor America

Demurrer to Complaint; Motion to Strike Portions Of Complaint; Case Management Conference

Hearing date
Jun 2, 2026
Department
C25
Prevailing
N/A
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Demurrer rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffHill
DefendantHyundai Motor America

Ruling

regarding the habitability of the apartment. Plaintiff alleges that Romo acted with a conscious disregard of Plaintiff’s safety when representing that the apartment at issue was habitable when she knew otherwise. (See e.g., SAC, ¶¶ 5-7, 13-15, 77-79, 84-93, 95-97, 103-104, 119-120, 124-128, and 135-137.) The Court acknowledges that Plaintiff did not file an opposition to the Motion to Strike. Still, the SAC contains facts sufficient to support the claim and the Court will resolve the motion on the merits. The Motion to Strike is DENIED. Defendant shall file an answer to the operative Second Amended Complaint within 20 days of notice of this ruling. Plaintiff to give notice

103 Hill vs. Hyundai Motor America

25-01479317 1. Demurrer to Complaint – Off Calendar FAC filed 2. Motion to Strike Portions Of Complaint – Off Calendar FAC filed 3. Case Management Conference – Off Calendar.

104 Team Koncepts General Contractors, Inc. vs. A&G Real Estate and Construction Services, Inc.

24-01376389 Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel of Record Sean Dowsing and Bayan Salehi of Kahan Feld LLP move to be relieved as counsel of record for A&G Real Estate and Construction Services, Inc. dba SCG West Development. The Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel of Record is DENIED, without prejudice. The notice of motion and motion, the declaration, and the proposed order must be served on the client and on all other parties who have appeared in the case. (California Rules of Court, rule 3.1362(d).)

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share