COUNTY OF SAN MATEO v. VINCE BRYANT TEASDALE

1 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 2

COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3

UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 4

6) COUNTY OF SAN MATEO,) Case Number: FCS-13-349266 7) Petitioner) Hearing Date: May 28, 2026 8) VS.) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 9) VINCE BRYANT TEASDALE,) Department: 403 10) Respondent) Presiding: JERILYN BORACK 11)) 12

REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHILD SUPPORT RE: CHANGE 13

14 Having read and considered the pleadings, declarations, and other evidence submitted in this matter, the 15 Court makes the following findings and orders: 16 A. Procedural History 17 1) The parties are Respondent Vince Bryant Teasdale (Father) and Other Parent Rosa May Mohr 18 (Mother). 19 2) They share two minor children: Vincent (DOB: 5/14/08) and Tamia (DOB: 5/14/08). 20 3) On 3/19/26, Mother filed a Request for Order seeking modification of child support because the 21 minor children currently reside with Mother and Father has no parenting time.

The matter was set 22 on 4/21/26 at 8:30 AM in Dept. 414. 23 4) On 3/19/26, Mother filed an Income and Expense Declaration. 24 5) On 3/26/26, the Department of Child Support Services (DCSS) filed a Notice Regarding Payment 25 of Support Substitution of Payee indicating the local child support agency is no longer providing 26 enforcement services in the case. 27 6) On 4/1/26, DCSS filed a Proof of Service by Mail demonstrating Mother and Father were noticed 28 of the substitution of payee. 29

1 7) On 4/1/26, the Court continued the matter (on its own motion) to 5/28/26 at 9 AM in Dept. 403 2 because DCSS is no longer involved in the case. 3 8) Mother did not file a Proof of Service indicating her 3/19/26 Request for Order and Income and 4 Expense Declaration were served on Father. 5 9) Father did not file a Responsive Declaration. 6 B. Findings and Order 7 1) The Court hereby vacates the 5/28/2026 hearing on Mother’s Request for Order filed 3/19/2026 8 as well as the 6/1/2026 hearing on Mother’s Request for Order filed 3/20/2026. The children have 9 reached the age of majority. As such, the Court does not have jurisdiction to make custody or 10 visitation orders regarding the children, nor does the Court have jurisdiction to modify 11 prospective child support. 12 2) The Court will prepare the Findings and Order After Hearing. 13

17

21

25