DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
18CV324139·santaclara·Civil·Motion to be Relieved as Counsel
Hearing 3 months agoGRANTED

Homayoun Camran Farahani, et al. v. Hadi Farahani, et al.

Motion to be Relieved as Counsel

Hearing date
Jun 3, 2026
Department
16
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Attorneys

James Cai(SAC Attorneys, LLP)for Defendant
Dennis Chin(SAC Attorneys, LLP)for Defendant

Ruling

LINE CASE NO. CASE TITLE TENTATIVE RULING 9:01 18CV324139 Homayoun Camran Farahani, Order on Motion by Defense Counsel 1 et al. to be Relieved as Counsel for v. Defendant Hadi Farahani Hadi Farahani, et al. Defense counsel James Cai and Dennis Chin of SAC Attorneys, LLP move under Code of Civil Procedure Section 284(2) for an Order to be Relieved as Counsel for Defendant Hadi Farahani.

As the Motion complies with applicable law and is well supported and duly served, the Motion is hereby GRANTED.

The Court will sign and file the Proposed Order that has already been prepared by Defendant’s counsel and filed with this Motion.

SO ORDERED.

9:01 24CV440754 Edward Ross, deceased, by and Order on Motion by Plaintiff’ Counsel 2 through his Heir and Successor to be Relieved as Counsel for Plaintiff in Interest, Laura Ross, Edward Ross, deceased, by and v. through his Heir and Successor in Covenant Care California, LLC Interest, Laura Ross d/b/a Gilroy Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center, et al. Plaintiff’s counsel Dawn M. Smith of Smith Clinesmith LLP move under Code of Civil Procedure Section 284(2) for an Order to be Relieved as Counsel for Plaintiff Edward Ross, deceased, by and through his Heir and Successor in Interest, Laura Ross.

As the Motion complies with applicable law and is well supported and duly served, the Motion is hereby GRANTED.

The Court will sign and file the Proposed Order that has already been prepared by Plaintiff’s counsel and filed with this Motion.

SO ORDERED.

2

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share