Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel of Record
regarding the habitability of the apartment. Plaintiff alleges that Romo acted with a conscious disregard of Plaintiff’s safety when representing that the apartment at issue was habitable when she knew otherwise. (See e.g., SAC, ¶¶ 5-7, 13-15, 77-79, 84-93, 95-97, 103-104, 119-120, 124-128, and 135-137.) The Court acknowledges that Plaintiff did not file an opposition to the Motion to Strike. Still, the SAC contains facts sufficient to support the claim and the Court will resolve the motion on the merits. The Motion to Strike is DENIED. Defendant shall file an answer to the operative Second Amended Complaint within 20 days of notice of this ruling. Plaintiff to give notice
103 Hill vs. Hyundai Motor America
25-01479317 1. Demurrer to Complaint – Off Calendar FAC filed 2. Motion to Strike Portions Of Complaint – Off Calendar FAC filed 3. Case Management Conference – Off Calendar.
104 Team Koncepts General Contractors, Inc. vs. A&G Real Estate and Construction Services, Inc.
24-01376389 Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel of Record Sean Dowsing and Bayan Salehi of Kahan Feld LLP move to be relieved as counsel of record for A&G Real Estate and Construction Services, Inc. dba SCG West Development. The Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel of Record is DENIED, without prejudice. The notice of motion and motion, the declaration, and the proposed order must be served on the client and on all other parties who have appeared in the case. (California Rules of Court, rule 3.1362(d).)
There is no proof of service showing service of any of the moving papers on the client. In addition, the submitted proof of service shows that only the declaration was served, and only on the opposing party. (See ROA 188, 191.) Further, the notice of motion and motion provide that Sean Dowsing and Bayan Salehi move to be relieved as counsel of record, but only a declaration by Sean Dowsing has been submitted. Due to the defects above, the motion to be relieved as counsel of record is DENIED, without prejudice. Moving attorney to give notice.
105 Kowalczyk vs. Gracey
25-01471642 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice x 3 The unopposed applications of attorneys (1) Mitchell Schuster, (2) Stacey Ashby, and (3) Milton Otto of Meister Seelig & Fein PLLC to appear pro hac vice on behalf of Plaintiffs Edward Kowalczyk and The Fifth Veda, Inc. are GRANTED. Moving attorneys met the requirements of California Rules of Court, rule 9.40
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
106 Pacific Carpets, LLC vs. Panku, Inc.
22-01245791 Motion for Attorney Fees Defendants 2525 Main Apartment, LP (“2525 Main”); Panku, Inc.; ASD Capital Management, LP; and Assured Management, LLC (collectively, “Defendants”) move for an order granting them attorney fees in the amount of $98,445.00 incurred in the appellate matters arising from the instant action against Plaintiff and Cross-Defendant Pacific Carpets, LLC pursuant to Civil Code section 1717.