Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice
3. As to the additional payments to the class, the declaration is dated the same day as the check cashing deadline, and $10,098.37 remains in the administrator’s custody. ROA 284 ¶ 9. Accordingly, even if the $800,000 GSA had been fully and finally disbursed, the additional funds portion of the settlement is not fully and finally disbursed, and the court’s file cannot be closed.
4. Plaintiff has also failed to comply with the order and judgment in that the court ordered “at the time of the final accounting that Class Counsel transmit a copy of this order and the final judgment and the final accounting to the Judicial Council. (CCP 384.5; Govt Code 68520.).” ROA ¶ 276 15. No such proof of service has been filed.
Plaintiff shall submit the final report of the settlement administrator regarding the status of the settlement administration no later than sixteen (16) court days prior to the continued hearing. The final report must include all information necessary for the Court to determine the total amount of the settlement funds actually paid to all Class Members, the number of uncashed checks, the amount of unclaimed funds, if any, and the amount remitted to the State Controller’s Office Unclaimed Property Fund. If the settlement funds are not completely disbursed by the report deadline, counsel must request a continuance or the court will set an OSC re: sanctions.
Plaintiff is ordered to give notice of this ruling and file proof of service. 101 Medero vs. Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice Norada Capital Management The Application of Thomas Kimble for Admission to Appear Pro Hac Vice filed by various Norada Company Defendants and Defendant Marco Santarellis CONTINUED to July 2, 2024- 2026, at 2:00 p.m. in Department CX102 so counsel can address the 01445239 following defect:
• Actual proof of service on, and proof of payment to, the State Bar of California has not been provided.
Supplemental or amended papers must be filed no later than fourteen (16) calendar days prior to the continued hearing.
Moving party is ordered to give notice of this ruling and file proof of service within five (5) court days. 102 Hernandez vs.
1. Case Management Conference Big Canyon 2. Motion to Compel Arbitration Country Club
2025- CMC CONTINUED AND MTC HEARING VACATED 01485840
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”